How many times has [2011] EWCA Civ 1411 been cited?

[2011] EWCA Civ 1411 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] EWCA Civ 1411

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Lufthansa Technik AG v Panasonic Avionics Corporation & Ors 2023-11-01
“…nt from their bag which had not been duly disclosed in the pre-trial disclosure process, and trying to rely on it. Permission would be needed, see SOCA v Namli [2011] EWCA Civ 1411 paragraph 20 and McTear v Engelhard [2016] EWCA Civ 487.…”
Cited — HM Revenue and Customs v Smart Price Midlands Ltd & Anor 2019-05-16
“…[2011] EWCA Civ 1411 (‘Namli’). In that case, Master Leslie had directed the parties to give standard disclosure in accordance with CPR r 31.6. This required SOCA to disclose:…”