How many times has [2011] EWCA Civ 548 been cited?

[2011] EWCA Civ 548 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] EWCA Civ 548

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2011] EWCA Civ 548

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Applied · 1Cited · 1

Applied — Avondale Park Limited v Miss Delaney's Nursery Schools Limited 2023-06-07
“…In determining the question, the ordinary principles underlying the interpretation of contracts apply: BDW Trading Ltd v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 at [34].…”
Cited — Abdulrahman Bin Abdullah bin Ibrahim Al-Subaihi & Anor. v Mishal Maan Al-Sanea 2022-10-20
“…lear express provisions to the contrary” needs to be treated with caution. As was said in BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (at [34] to [36]), they should not be read as meaning more than a clear contractual intention to be gathered from the express provisions of the contract;…”