- Cited — The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Hockley & Anor 2019-06-24
“…quent to the decisions in R (Carmichael & Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 (“Carmichael”) and Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629 further categories have been added to B13(5)(a) to (e) to reflect the findings of the courts, however they postdate the relevant determination in this appeal.…”
- Explained — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…y a difference in treatment based on that ground. Although not spelt out in the judgment, this seems to me to explain why in Burnip v Birmingham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117, para 22, the Court of Appeal considered that resort to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities would have re…”
- Considered — The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor 2018-03-20
“…by Mrs Carmichael that her case was indistinguishable from that of Gorry (one of the appeals allowed by the Court of Appeal in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117), a case of children who were disabled and so could not sleep in the same bedroom. The Court of Appeal considered that the Secretary of State …”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor 2018-03-20
“…d Wilson’s judgment in T to which reference has already been made. It also emerges from the decision of the Court of Appeal in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117 (to which I referred at [8] above), where the single bedroom rule in Regulation B13 was held to be discriminatory in violation of Article 14 o…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor 2018-03-20
“…The decision of the Supreme Court in the MA case built on an earlier decision of the Court of Appeal in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117, in which the application of the Housing Benefit Regulations was found to discriminate unlawfully against severely disabled individuals in thr…”
- Cited — DA & Orss, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2018-03-15
“…acy of housing benefit to meet the cost of accommodation suitable for the needs of severely disabled claimants (as was held in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117), it is relevant to an assessment of the proportionality of a measure which is liable to give rise to transitional difficulties in individual …”