“…In SS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 945 one of the grounds of appeal against a decision that the appellant was not a victim of rape was that the tribunal wrongly discounted the medical evidence that …”
“…d to express their opinion on the degree to which their findings support an individual’s narrative: R (AM) v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 521 and SS (Sri Lanka) v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 945;…”
“…t’s favour even if he has not raised them himself. The same approach applies to the FTT and the UT: SS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 945. But that is because both the FTT and the UT are part of the decision-making process: SS (Sri Lanka) at [17]. This court is not. Thus the “Robinson duty” is no…”