“…at a legitimate expectation claim depended on a “clear and unambiguous” representation (see paragraphs 73, 115 and 134). In R (Patel) v General Medical Council [2013] EWCA Civ 327, [2013] 1 WLR 2801, Lloyd Jones LJ, with whom Lord Dyson MR and Lloyd LJ agreed, accepted at paragraph 40 that the requirement had “certainly not been watered …”
“…ualification”: see R. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte MFK Underwriting[1990] 1 WLR 1545at 1569G-H per Bingham LJ; R (Patel) v General Medical Council [2013] EWCA Civ 327; [2013] 1 WLR 2801 at [40] per Lloyd-Jones LJ. As Lloyd-Jones LJ went on to say at [44]: “The question for consideration is how, on a fair reading of the state…”
“…ning. She relied upon what was said by Sedley LJ in Bhatt Murphy at [70] and a passage in the judgment of Lloyd-Jones LJ in R (Patel) v General Medical Council [2013] EWCA Civ 327; [2013] 1 WLR 2801 at [83], emphasising that there was no evidence of urgency necessitating an immediate change of policy and criticising the failure to consid…”