How many times has [2013] EWCA Civ 925 been cited?

[2013] EWCA Civ 925 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] EWCA Civ 925

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2013] EWCA Civ 925

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Approved · 1

Cited — Sandoz Limited v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company 2023-05-04
“…In Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Co Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 925, [2014] RPC 4 the patent concerned an improved composition of a synthetic mixture of polypeptides known as copolymer-1. Mylan attacked the validity of the pate…”
Approved — Anan Kasei Co Ltd & Anor v Neo Chemicals And Oxides Ltd & Anor 2019-10-09
“…With the substitution of “uncertain” for “ambiguous” I agree. This court approved this passage on the appeal from Arnold J: [2013] EWCA Civ 925 at [193] where Floyd LJ also said:…”