- Followed — L. M. Associates Ltd v Gibbeson 2020-11-06
“…t the meaning of TWM is that the application in question is “bound to fail”: see Wasif at [9] to [12] and R (Grace) v Secretary of Statefor the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 1091, [2014] 1 WLR 3432. Certification of an application as TWM is therefore reserved for cases which have no conceivable prospect of success, and it follows that n…”
- Cited — Kearney v Hampshire Police 2019-10-31
“…ve been held to include the ability for a claimant to access an appeal to the Court of Appeal (see for example, the observations of Maurice Kay LJ Grace v SSHD [2014] EWCA Civ 1091, [2014] 1 WLR 3432) but submits this safeguard would not be available here on the Respondent’s approach. The Appellant has also been deprived of the opportunit…”
- Cited — Kearney v Hampshire Police 2019-10-31
“… could succeed so that it is bound to fail and accordingly, totally without merit. As this court held in R (Grace) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 1091, [2014] 1 WLR 3432, the purpose of CPR 54.12(7) is to limit the unjustified burden placed on public authorities and the courts, of hopeless applications for ju…”
- Cited — Sartipy (aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc 2019-03-01
“…A claim or application is totally without merit if it is bound to fail in the sense that there is no rational basis on which it could succeed: R (Grace) v SSHD [2014] EWCA Civ 1091, [2014] 1 WLR 3432 and R (Wasif) v SSHD [2016] EWCA Civ 82, [2016] 1 WLR…”