How many times has [2015] EWCA Civ 26 been cited?

[2015] EWCA Civ 26 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2015] EWCA Civ 26

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2015] EWCA Civ 26

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Re D (A Child) (Abduction: Child's Objections: Representation of Child Party) 2023-09-14
“…e at odds with the child’s welfare (see In re M (Children)(Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2008] AC 1288; and In re M (Children) (Abduction: Child’s objections) [2015] EWCA Civ 26); [2016] Fam 1.…”
Cited — A (A Child) (1980 Hague Convention: Set Aside) 2021-02-23
“…Re M (Children) (Republic of Ireland) (Child’s Objections) (Joinder of children as parties to appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 26, [2016] Fam 1…”
Cited — G (Abduction: Consent/discretion) 2021-02-09
“…In similar vein, Black LJ in Re M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children As Parties To Appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 26 also made clear, in a case focused upon a child’s objections, at [130], that: ‘Hague Convention considerations are also a vital consideration at the discretion…”