How many times has [2016] EWCA Civ 814 been cited?

[2016] EWCA Civ 814 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] EWCA Civ 814

· cited by 2 · influence score 16/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2016] EWCA Civ 814

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Liverpool Open And Green Spaces Community Interest Company, R (On the Application Of) v Liverpool City Council 2020-07-09
“…tead Society) v Camden London Borough Council [2007] 2 P. & C.R. 19, and R. (on the application of Lensbury Ltd.) v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council [2016] EWCA Civ 814). This understanding of Policy OE3, he said, is consistent with the origins of the policy in the…”
Cited — Brown v London Borough of Ealing Council & Anor 2018-03-23
“…[2016] EWCA Civ 814, [2017] J.P.L. 96, where Sales L.J. noted (in paragraph 31 of his judgment) that, under Policy 7.17 of the London Plan, “the protection to be afforded to the M…”