- Cited — Teva UK Limited & Anor v Novartis AG 2022-12-08
“…jurisdiction of the Patents Court to grant an Arrow declaration was confirmed by this Court in Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1, [2018] Bus LR 228, where Floyd LJ giving the judgment of the Court (himself, Longmore and Kitchin LJJ) said at [98]:…”
- Cited — Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See 2022-07-26
“…]. ‘Justice’ includes justice not only to the claimant, but also to the defendant: see Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd. v Abb Vie Biotechnology Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1, [2018] Bus LR 228 ("Fujifilm") at [60];…”
- Cited — Vestel Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. & Anor v Access Advance LLC & Anor 2021-03-26
“…clarations of non-liability for patent infringement. The jurisdiction to grant this kind of declaration of non-liability is well established (FujiFilm v Abbvie [2017] EWCA Civ 1). The oddity of the situation in Pfizer was that the patentee had abandoned all its UK patent rights, while keeping corresponding rights in other states arisin…”
- Cited — Mexichem UK Ltd v Honeywell International Inc 2020-04-01
“…eclarations in appropriate cases has been reviewed by this court in two cases: Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited and another [2017] EWCA Civ 1; and in Glaxo Group Limited v Vectura Limited [2018] EWCA Civ 1496. It is now settled that such declarations may in principle be granted where justified by the…”
- Cited — Glaxo Group Ltd & Ors v Vectura Ltd 2018-06-28
“…In Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd. v AbbVie Biotechnology Limitedand another [2017] EWCA Civ 1 this court examined for the first time whether Arrow declarations were available in principle, or whether there existed fundamental obstacles to their grant. T…”