How many times has [2017] EWCA Civ 369 been cited?

[2017] EWCA Civ 369 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2017] EWCA Civ 369

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2017] EWCA Civ 369

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Annetts v Adeleye 2018-03-22
“…y residential use of the dominant tenement, as part of the garden of Dawning, is an ancillary use and therefore the Strip is not land-locked: see Gore v Naheed [2017] EWCA Civ 369. So, on his submission, that is not a reason for saying that the right of way was not abandoned.…”
Cited — Annetts v Adeleye 2018-03-22
“…y residential use of the dominant tenement, as part of the garden of Dawning, is an ancillary use and therefore the Strip is not land-locked: see Gore v Naheed [2017] EWCA Civ 369. So, on his submission, that is not a reason for saying that the right of way was not abandoned.…”