“…but not on the second. The UT said that this argument failed to recognise the distinction, explained in Baigazieva v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1088, between the point at which status as a family member and the right under regulation 10 begins (the date of the decree absolute) and the criteria which must be…”
“…Baigazieva v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1088 is a judgment given by Singh LJ, apparently in open court. No counsel appeared for either side. As he explained in paragraph 1, the parties had agreed a consen…”