How many times has [2010] EWCA Crim 1081 been cited?

[2010] EWCA Crim 1081 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2010] EWCA Crim 1081

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Connell, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-06-15
“…Mr Rule submitted further that the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Decision) in R v Kluxen [2010] EWCA Crim 1081, [2011] 1 WLR 218 was binding authority in the appellant’s favour. Kluxen was an early case on the effect of the deportation provisions of the 2007 Act. Two ap…”
Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Robinson (Jamaica) 2018-02-02
“…Mr Blundell drew the attention of this Court to the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in R v Kluxen [2010] EWCA Crim 1081; [2011] 1 WLR 218, at paras. 14-24, where the Court (in a judgment given by Thomas LJ, as he then was) concluded that the Bouchereau test is still valid and ha…”