How many times has [2003] EWHC 1319 (Ch) been cited?

[2003] EWHC 1319 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] EWHC 1319 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Assetco Plc v Grant Thornton UK LLP 2020-08-28
“…eak in the chain of causation, because the losses were the “very thing” that GT was under a duty to protect against (see Barings plc v Coopers & Lybrand (No 7) [2003] EWHC 1319 (Ch), [2003] Lloyd’s Rep IR 566).…”
Cited — Assetco Plc v Grant Thornton UK LLP 2020-08-28
“…Mr Templeman relies on the judgment of Evans-Lombe J in Barings plc v Coopers & Lybrand [2003] EWHC 1319 (Ch), [2003] Lloyd’s Rep IR 566. A subsidiary in the Barings group (BFS) incurred large losses as a result of unauthorised securities trading in Singapore which wer…”