How many times has [2004] EWHC 3348 (Ch) been cited?

[2004] EWHC 3348 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2004] EWHC 3348 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Mohammad Razi Khan v Arvinder Singh-Sall & Anor 2023-10-06
“…Mr Ijezie based his argument on two decisions of the High Court. The first was that of Neuberger J (as he then was) in Guinan III v Caldwell Associates Ltd [2004] EWHC 3348 (Ch) (“Guinan”), the second that of Hildyard J in Mowbray v Sanders [2015] EWHC 296 (Ch) (“Mowbray”).…”
Cited — Global 100 Limited v Maria Laleva 2021-12-03
“…, which, for practical purposes, is synonymous with “real as opposed to frivolous.” See also Hofer v Strawson[1999] 2 BCLC 336; Guinan III v Caldwell Associates[2004] EWHC 3348 (Ch), [2004] BPIR 531.…”