How many times has [2006] EWHC 1511 (Ch) been cited?

[2006] EWHC 1511 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2006] EWHC 1511 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Gertner v CFL Finance Ltd & Anor 2018-07-30
“…ol v Goldstein [1994] 1 WLR 1610; Doorbar v Alltime Securities (Nos 1 and 2) [1996] 1 WLR 456; and Re Newlands (Seaford) Educational Trust; Chittenden v Pepper [2006] EWHC 1511 (Ch).”…”
Cited — Gertner v CFL Finance Ltd & Anor 2018-07-30
“…ned (e.g. a claim for damages) and those where it will also be contingent and, as a consequence, unascertained. An example of the latter is Chittenden v Pepper [2006] EWHC 1511 (Ch) where a landlord’s claim for future rent was held to be dependent on the lease not being forfeited and the premises remaining unlet for a further two years. Th…”