Is [2007] EWHC 2394 (Ch) still good law?

This case has been given negative treatment in 1 later judgment(s) in this dataset (e.g. doubted or not followed), so its authority may be qualified — verify before relying on it.

How many times has [2007] EWHC 2394 (Ch) been cited?

[2007] EWHC 2394 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2007] EWHC 2394 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? ⚠️ This case has negative treatment (1 citation(s): e.g. doubted / not followed / overruled). Check carefully before relying on it.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Treatment

Cited · 1Overruled · 1

Citation network

Cited by (2)

Cited — NTN Corporation & Ors. v Stellantis N.V. & Ors. 2022-01-07
“…[2007] EWHC 2394 (Ch)…”
Overruled — Phonographic Performance Ltd v Ellis (t/a Bla Bla Bar) 2018-12-18
“…rd exemplary damages: see AB v South West Water Services Ltd [1993] QB 507, 527 (overruled on a different point) and Devenish Nutrition Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis SA [2007] EWHC 2394 (Ch), [2009] Ch 390 (not appealed on this point).…”

Frequently cited alongside

[2009] Ch 390 2×
[2016] CAT 11 1×
[1912] AC 673 1×
ED&F Man Liquid Products Ltd. v Patel & Anor [2003] EWCA Civ 472 1×
OMV Petrom SA v Glencore International AG (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 778 1×