- Cited — John Bruce v Wychavon District Council 2023-11-24
“…dence, in circumstances where that is proffered as the good reason for the non-attendance. The most useful guidance is set out by Norris J in Levy v Ellis-Carr [2012] EWHC 63 (Ch) at [36], where he said:…”
- Cited — Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors v Tradition Financial Services Ltd 2021-02-22
“…g: see the notes in CivilProcedure (the White Book) 2020 at §3.1.3 and the cases there cited, in particular the guidance given by Norris J in Levy v Ellis-Carr [2012] EWHC 63 (Ch), endorsed by decisions of this Court. But the present case was…”
- Approved — McKay v The All England Lawn Tennis Club (Championships) Ltd & Ors 2020-06-02
“…urt. The doctor’s letter was deficient in a number of respects, and did not in any event satisfy the well-known guidance given by Norris J in Levy v Ellis-Carr [2012] EWHC 63 (Ch) at [36] and expressly approved by this court in Forresters Ketley vBrent and Another [2012] EWCA Civ 324 at [26]. As Norris J there said, of the evidence in th…”
- Cited — Corrigan v Chelsea Football Club Ltd 2019-11-19
“…berlain J further pointed out in that case, such medical evidence should ordinarily satisfy the criteria indicated in court decisions such as Levy v Ellis-Carr [2012] EWHC 63 (Ch). This report does not do so; and the defendant’s own position, as advanced by him in his affidavit to the effect that he felt “overwhelmed” and so on, does not…”
- Explained — General Medical Council v Hayat 2018-12-13
“…identify with proper particularity the individual’s condition and explain why that condition prevents their participation in the hearing: see Levy v Ellis Carr [2012] EWHC 63 (Ch) at [36]. Moreover, that evidence should be unchallenged: see Brabazon-Drenning at [18].…”
- Cited — Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1) 2018-01-18
“…“With regard to medical evidence, the parties were again in agreement that the relevant principles are those stated by Norris J in Levi v Ellis-Carr [2012] EWHC 63 (Ch) at [36], which were endorsed by this court in Forresters Ketley v Brent [2012] EWCA Civ 324 at [26] by Lewison LJ, with whom Longmore LJ agreed. Norris J said …”