How many times has [2013] EWHC 2880 (Ch) been cited?

[2013] EWHC 2880 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] EWHC 2880 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd & Ors v Mitsubishi Electric Corporation & Anor 2020-11-19
“…acts: IPCom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co. Limited and others [2013] EWHC 52 (Pat) (Floyd J) (“IPCom 1”); IPCom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co. Limited and others [2013] EWHC 2880 (Ch) (Roth J) (“IPCom 2”); TQ Delta LLC v Zyxel Communications UK Ltd and another [2018] EWHC 1515 (Ch); [2018] Bus LR 1544 (Henry Carr J); Infederation Limited v G…”
Cited — Mohamed & Ors v Abdelmamoud & Anor 2018-04-23
“… at issue and so were not “directly affected” by the relevant order (see paragraph 62). In the most recent of the three, Ipcom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co Ltd [2013] EWHC 2880 (Ch), Roth J concluded (at paragraph 44) that CPR 40.9 “is broad enough to cover the case where a non-party seeks to contend that inspection of a document ordered a…”