UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2015] EWHC 296 (Ch)
[2015] EWHC 296 (Ch)
· cited by
2
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2015] EWHC 296 (Ch)
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Considered · 1
Cited · 1
Citation network
[2015] EWHC 296 (Ch)
Mohammad Razi Khan v Arvinder Sing
Mohammad Razi Khan v Arvinder Sing
cited by
Cited by (2)
Considered
—
Mohammad Razi Khan v Arvinder Singh-Sall & Anor
2023-10-06
“…This is consistent with what Hildyard J said at [82] in [Mowbray v Sanders [2015] EWHC 296 (Ch)], considered above.…”
Cited
—
Mohammad Razi Khan v Arvinder Singh-Sall & Anor
2023-10-06
“…at of Neuberger J (as he then was) in Guinan III v Caldwell Associates Ltd [2004] EWHC 3348 (Ch) (“Guinan”), the second that of Hildyard J in Mowbray v Sanders [2015] EWHC 296 (Ch) (“Mowbray”).…”