How many times has [2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch) been cited?

[2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch)

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Followed · 1

Cited — National Highways Limited v Person Unknown & Anor 2023-02-23
“…At [38] the judge adopted the summary of Marcus Smith J in Vastint Leeds BV v Persons Unknown (“Vastint”) [2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch); [2019] 4 WLR 2 as to the effect of Court of Appeal decisions on anticipatory injunctions. He said there were two questions he had to address:…”
Cited — Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd & Anor v Unknown Persons 2020-03-05
“…Vastint Leeds BV v Persons Unknown [2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch), [2019] 4 WLR 2 (Marcus Smith J), is authority to the contrary. Leaving aside that Vastint is a first instance decision, in which only the claimant was represe…”
Followed — The London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown (Rev 3) 2020-01-21
“…The key question is the second part of the test which has been expressed slightly differently in different cases. In Vastint Leeds BV v Persons Unknown [2018] EWHC 2456 (Ch) it was expressed as follows:…”