How many times has [2003] EWHC 2540 (Comm) been cited?

[2003] EWHC 2540 (Comm) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] EWHC 2540 (Comm)

· cited by 3 · influence score 18/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Explained · 1

Explained — Dodika Ltd & Ors v United Luck Group Holdings Ltd 2021-05-07
“…the Tax Investigation would not explain, or even identify, the basis of the Defendant’s Claim. As Cooke, J said in Laminates Acquisition Co v BTR Australia Ltd [2003] EWHC 2540 (Comm); [2004] 1 All ER (Comm) 737, at para. 45:…”
Cited — Dodika Ltd & Ors v United Luck Group Holdings Ltd 2021-05-07
“…or example, the temporal limits of or the exclusions applicable to the Tax Covenant) or otherwise to deal with it (Laminates Acquisition Co v BTR Australia Ltd [2003] EWHC 2540 (Comm); [2004] 1 All ER (Comm) 737, para. 43).…”
Cited — Stobart Group Ltd & Anor v Stobart & Anor (Rev 1) 2019-07-31
“…Furthermore, as Cooke J observed in LaminatesAcquisition Co v. BTR Australia Limited [2003] EWHC 2540 (Comm) at [29] having referred to the speech of Lord Steyn in Mannai Investments (above) and the judgment of Stuart-Smith LJ in Senate Electrical:…”