Is [2014] EWHC 755 (Comm) still good law?

This case has been given negative treatment in 1 later judgment(s) in this dataset (e.g. doubted or not followed), so its authority may be qualified — verify before relying on it.

How many times has [2014] EWHC 755 (Comm) been cited?

[2014] EWHC 755 (Comm) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2014] EWHC 755 (Comm)

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? ⚠️ This case has negative treatment (1 citation(s): e.g. doubted / not followed / overruled). Check carefully before relying on it.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Treatment

Cited · 1Not followed · 1

Citation network

Cited by (2)

Cited — Marino v FM Capital Partners Ltd 2020-02-26
“…[2014] EWHC 755 (Comm)…”
Not followed — Marino v FM Capital Partners Ltd 2020-02-26
“…Management Ltd v Urumov [2014] EWHC 755 (Comm) and not following the approach taken by this Court in Townsend v Stone Toms & Partners (1984) 27 BLR 26 and by Steyn J in Banque Keyser Ullman v Skandia Insura…”

Frequently cited alongside

[1991] 2 AC 548 1×
[2005] Ch 119 1×
[2008] EWHC 2893 (Ch) 1×
[2018] EWHC 2016 (Ch) 1×
[2018] EWHC 1768 (Comm) 1×