How many times has [2017] EWHC 1750 (Comm) been cited?

[2017] EWHC 1750 (Comm) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2017] EWHC 1750 (Comm)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 1Cited · 1

Followed — W Nagel (A Firm) v Pluczenik Diamond Company NV 2018-11-28
“…The following summary of the background facts is abbreviated from the findings made at paras 1 to 27 of the judgment of Popplewell J: [2017] EWHC 1750 (Comm).…”
Cited — Computer Associates UK Ltd v The Software Incubator Ltd 2018-03-19
“…his is relevant to the question as to how far the courts can go in construing the language. Popplewell J accepted this point in Nagel v Pluczenik Diamond Co NV [2017] EWHC 1750 (Comm) at [63]:…”