How many times has [2010] EWHC 1549 (Fam) been cited?

[2010] EWHC 1549 (Fam) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2010] EWHC 1549 (Fam)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Approved · 1Cited · 1

Cited — A Local Authority v JB (Rev 2) 2020-06-11
“…In addition, the Court endorsed observations made by Bodey J in Re A (Capacity:Refusal of Contraception) [2010] EWHC 1549 (Fam) that there should be a practical limit on what needed to be envisaged as the “reasonably foreseeable consequences” of a decision, or of failing to make a decis…”
Approved — B v A Local Authority 2019-06-11
“…In IM at [80] the Court of Appeal, approving the approach of Bodey J in Re A (Capacity: Refusal of Contraception) [2010] EWHC 1549 (Fam), [2011] Fam 61 at [63] and [64], said that there must be a practical limit on what needs to be envisaged as “reasonably foreseeable consequences” in the MCA s.…”