How many times has [2011] EWHC 1704 (Fam) been cited?

[2011] EWHC 1704 (Fam) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] EWHC 1704 (Fam)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Mazhar v Birmingham Community Healthcare Foundation NHS Trust & Ors (Rev 1) 2020-10-27
“…least risky to the individual’s physical wellbeing. This is an example of the “protection imperative” to which I referred in PH v ALocal Authority, Z Ltd and R [2011] EWHC 1704 (Fam) and CC v KK [2012] EWHC 2136 (COP), drawing on the observations of Ryder LJ in Oldham MBC v GW andPW [2007] EWHC136 (Fam) [2007] 2 FLR 597 – the need to protec…”
Cited — B v A Local Authority 2019-06-11
“…areful not to discriminate against persons suffering from a mental disability by imposing too high a test of capacity: see, for example, PH v A Local Authority [2011] EWHC 1704 (Fam) at [16xi].…”