- Considered — Brake & Ors v The Chedington Court Estate Ltd 2022-10-10
“…Mr Sutcliffe referred us to the decision of Haddon-Cave J in AAZ v BBZ [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam), [2017] 2 FCR 415. The particular question that the judge was considering in that case was whether, for the purpose of redistributing assets under the Matrimon…”
- Cited — Potanina v Potanin (Rev 2) 2021-05-13
“…dge was taken to and examined in some detail the judgment of Moylan J (as he then was) in AA v BB (Financial Remedies: Sharing Principle: Special Contribution) [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam); [2018] 1 FLR 153 (‘AA v BB’). Mr Howard highlighted that the wife in that case had come to this country after the marriage broke down having had no previous c…”
- Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“… on 5 December 2016. Haddon-Cave J handed down judgment on 15 December 2016: AAZ v BBZ and Others (Financial Remedies: Sharing Principle: Special Contribution) [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam), [2018] 1 FLR 153. He gave a further judgment on 20 December 2016: AAZ v BBZ and Ors[2016] EWHC 3361 (Fam). His final order is dated 20 December 2016.…”
- Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…The bulk of the enormous wealth in this case, found by Haddon-Cave J (AAZ v BBZ and Others (Financial Remedies: Sharing Principle: Special Contribution) [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam), [2018] 1 FLR 153, para 106) to amount to £1,092,334,626, was held by the third respondent, Cotor Investment SA (“Cotor”), a Panamanian company referred to by …”
- Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…ons giving effect both to what Haddon-Cave J had said in his first judgment, AAZ v BBZ and Others (Financial Remedies: Sharing Principle: Special Contribution) [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam), [2018] 1 FLR 153, and to what he said in his third judgment, AAZ v BBZ and Ors[2016] EWHC 3361 (Fam). For present purposes I need say no more, except to note …”
- Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“… to the wife. We are not hearing an appeal from Haddon-Cave J’s judgments in AAZ v BBZ and Others (Financial Remedies: Sharing Principle: Special Contribution) [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam), [2018] 1 FLR 153, and AAZ v BBZ and Ors[2016] EWHC 3361 (Fam). The husband was not represented before us, he did not seek to be joined in Mr Kerman’s appeal, …”