How many times has [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam) been cited?

[2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam) is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam)

· cited by 4 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3Explained · 1

Explained — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…ich I shall refer in due course, were explained in a judgment handed down on 20 December 2016: Z v Z and others (Legal Professional Privilege: Fraud Exemption) [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam), [2017] 4 WLR 84.…”
Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…e directed to the transcript, but I can take what then happened from Haddon-Cave J’s judgment, Z v Z and others (Legal Professional Privilege: Fraud Exemption) [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam), [2017] 4 WLR 84, paras 4-8:…”
Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…made by Haddon-Cave J on 20 December 2016 prohibited Mr Kerman from disclosing the judgment in Z v Z and others (Legal Professional Privilege: Fraud Exemption) [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam), [2017] 4 WLR 84, to anyone other than the wife and her legal advisers, Mr Kerman and his legal advisers.…”
Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…er before us is Mr Kerman’s appeal from the matters referred to in Haddon-Cave J’s judgment in Z v Z and others (Legal Professional Privilege: Fraud Exemption) [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam), [2017] 4 WLR 84. There is no appeal by the husband before us. Indeed, so far as I am aware, he has never sought permission to appeal and his time for doing so…”