How many times has [2003] EWHC 2588 (Pat) been cited?

[2003] EWHC 2588 (Pat) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] EWHC 2588 (Pat)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Applied · 1

Cited — Andrew James Barclay-Watt & Ors. v Alpha Panareti Public Limited & Anor. 2022-08-19
“…WLR 890 esp at 835–6, MCA Records Inc v Charly Records Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1441 esp at [49]–[53], Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Princo Digital Disc GmbH [2003] EWHC 2588 (Pat) esp at [23], Contex Drouzhba v Wiseman [2006] EWHC 2708 (QB) asp at [60] and [97]–[98], Global Crossing Ltd v Global Crossing Ltd [2006) EWHC 2043 (Ch) esp at …”
Applied — Andrew James Barclay-Watt & Ors. v Alpha Panareti Public Limited & Anor. 2022-08-19
“…This passage was cited and applied by Mr Justice Pumfrey in Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Princo Digital Disc GmbH [2003] EWHC 2588 (Pat), another case of copyright infringement. Mr Justice Pumfrey added:…”