How many times has [2009] EWHC 3264 (QB) been cited?

[2009] EWHC 3264 (QB) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2009] EWHC 3264 (QB)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Cited · 1

Cited — Karen Smith & Anor. v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc 2021-12-03
“…tation period for an action on a specialty). As Mr George Leggatt QC (as he then was) observed when sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court in Patel v Patel[2009] EWHC 3264 (QB), [2010] 1 All ER (Comm) 864 (at [64]):…”
Considered — Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter 2021-03-11
“…ter’s claim is that set by section 9(1) for sums recoverable by statute. That is six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued. In Patel v Patel [2009] EWHC 3264 (QB), [2010] 1 All ER (Comm) 864, George Leggatt QC (sitting as a deputy High Court Judge) considered when the limitation period begins to run for the relief availa…”