How many times has [2012] EWHC 2843 (QB) been cited?

[2012] EWHC 2843 (QB) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2012] EWHC 2843 (QB)

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 1Applied · 1Cited · 1

Followed — The Law Society (Acting Through the Solicitors Regulation Authority) v Blavo 2018-10-16
“…urt within 8 days of service of the relevant notice (paragraphs 6(4) and 9(9) Part II, Schedule 1 to the 1974 Act). He determined, following Gadd v Law Society [2012] EWHC 2843 (QB), that, because this was an attack on the “legitimacy of the intervention, it would be an abuse of process to allow such a defence to be advanced. To allow such…”
Applied — The Law Society (Acting Through the Solicitors Regulation Authority) v Blavo 2018-10-16
“…compatible with the solicitor’s Convention rights had been rejected in Holder, at [110]. It was also applied by Sharp J (as she then was) in Gadd v Law Society [2012] EWHC 2843 (QB), at [38]; permission to appeal from this decision was refused, [2013] EWCA Civ 837.…”
Cited — Neumans LLP v The Solicitors Regulation Authority 2018-03-02
“…ish the scope of any common law obligation of prior notice and consultation. Certainly that was the view of Sharp J (as she then was) in Gadd v The Law Society [2012] EWHC 2843 (QB) who said:…”