How many times has [2013] EWHC 1121 (TCC) been cited?

[2013] EWHC 1121 (TCC) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2013] EWHC 1121 (TCC)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Distinguished · 1

Cited — Manchikalapati & Ors v Zurich Insurance Plc (t/a Zurich Building Guarantee & Zurich Municipal) & Ors 2019-12-05
“… as the claimants had incurred no costs, they had not suffered loss requiring compensation by interest: reliance was placed upon Hunt v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd. [2013] EWHC 1121 (TCC) (Akenhead J) and Kazakhstan Kagazy plc v Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunus and Harbour Fund 111 LLP [2018] EWHC 369 (Comm) (Picken J).…”
Distinguished — Manchikalapati & Ors v Zurich Insurance Plc (t/a Zurich Building Guarantee & Zurich Municipal) & Ors 2019-12-05
“…aim for the cost of future repairs. The Judge was mistaken. On this basis he wrongly distinguished the decisions of Akenhead J in Hunt v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd [2013] EWHC 1121 (TCC) (at paragraphs 3 and 4), and Picken…”