UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2001] UKHL 66
[2001] UKHL 66
· cited by
2
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2001] UKHL 66
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[2001] UKHL 66
Paul Cleeland (R on the applicatio
Paul Cleeland (R on the applicatio
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
Paul Cleeland (R on the application of) v Criminal Cases Review Commission
2022-01-11
“…[2001] UKHL 66;…”
Cited
—
Paul Cleeland (R on the application of) v Criminal Cases Review Commission
2022-01-11
“…fected the decision of the jury to convict, for this is a good test of whether, in the light of the fresh evidence, the conviction is unsafe – see R v Pendleton[2001] UKHL 66.…”
Frequently cited alongside
[1943] AC 147
1×