UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2002] UKHL 18
[2002] UKHL 18
· cited by
2
· influence score
12
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2002] UKHL 18
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[2002] UKHL 18
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Pot
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Pot
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter
2021-03-11
“…[2002] UKHL 18, [2003] 1 AC 384 (‘…”
Cited
—
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter
2021-03-11
“…This was the view of Lord Scott in Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolf [2002] UKHL 18, [2003] 1 AC 384. He concluded his analysis of the terms of section 32(1)(b) and 32(2) by rejecting any elaboration of their language such as the addition of a…”
Frequently cited alongside
14 App Cas 337
1×
[1899] AC 351
1×
[1949] 1 KB 550
1×
[1954] 1 WLR 1489
1×