- Cited — Edward Blacker, R (on the application of) v Chelmsford City Council 2023-01-17
“…does not take effect until it has been notified to the applicant, and not on a resolution to grant or refuse: see R (Burkett) v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC (No 1) [2002] UKHL 23, [2002] 1 WLR 1593. This means that it was open to the Planning Committee to change its mind at any time prior to the notification of its decision to the appli…”
- Cited — Braithwaite and Melton Meadows Properties Limited, R (on the application of) v East Suffolk Council 2022-12-21
“…s is a reference to the legally operative decision, for example a planning permission: see R. v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, ex parte Burkett [2002] UKHL 23; [2002] 1 W.L.R. 1593.…”
- Cited — The Queen on the application of BG (by his mother and litigation friend SQ) & Anor v Suffolk County Council 2022-07-26
“…R v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v Others Ex Parte Burkett and Another [2002] UKHL 23…”
- Cited — Oyston Estates Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Fylde Borough Council 2019-07-05
“…“certain and predictable” was emphasized by the House of Lords in R. (on the application of Burkett) v Hammersmith London Borough Council [2002] UKHL 23, though in a quite different context from the statutory regime with which we are concerned here (see the familiar passage at paragraphs 45 and 46 in the speech…”
- Cited — Archer, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs 2019-06-18
“…on subject to conditions precedent, which had been satisfied by the date when actual permission was granted? In R (Burkett) v Hammersmith London BoroughCouncil [2002] UKHL 23, [2002] 1 WLR 1593, the House of Lords decided that time did not begin to run until the latter date. This did not mean, however, that the court would lack juri…”
- Cited — Binning Property Corporation Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor 2019-02-28
“…[2002] UKHL 23, [2002] 1…”