How many times has [2002] UKHL 28 been cited?

[2002] UKHL 28 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] UKHL 28

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2002] UKHL 28

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Followed · 1

Cited — XDE v North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust 2020-04-23
“…[2002] UKHL 28…”
Followed — West v Stockport NHS Foundation Trust 2019-07-17
“…the other judges agreed, summarised the courts’ approach to the recovery of ATE insurance premiums and reasonableness by reference to Callery v Gray(Nos 1 & 2) [2002] UKHL 28, [2002] 1 WLR 2000, as follows:…”
Cited — Surrey v Barnet And Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust 2018-03-16
“…ther a change in funding method was reasonable is a question to be answered at the macro level. As Lord Scott put it in his dissenting speech in Callery v Gray [2002] UKHL 28, [2002] 1 WLR 2000 at [114]:…”