How many times has [2003] UKHL 30 been cited?

[2003] UKHL 30 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] UKHL 30

· cited by 4 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] UKHL 30

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Explained · 1Considered · 1

Considered — Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Sinclair & Ors 2021-04-16
“…niable that it would be. The effect of a TPDO was considered in detail by the House of Lords in Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30 (“Société Eram”). At [10]-[12] Lord Bingham traced the history of what were formerly called garnishee proceedings from the Common Law Procedure Act 1854 to the…”
Cited — SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd 2020-05-12
“…p 211, 220-222; Kwok Chi Leung Karl v Commissioner of Estate Duty [1988] 1 WLR 1035, 1040-1041; Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30, [2004] 1 AC 260, paragraph 72; Hillside (New Media) Ltd v Baasland [2010] EWHC 3336 (Comm), [2010] 2 CLC 986, paragraph 33; Taurus Petroleum Ltd v State Oil M…”
Cited — SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd 2020-05-12
“…[2003] UKHL 30, [2004] 1…”
Explained — SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd 2020-05-12
“… State B would be an interference with the sovereignty of State B. As Lord Hoffman explained in Société Eram Shipping Co Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation [2003] UKHL 30, [2004] 1 AC 260:…”