- Explained — Kickabout Production Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-04-26
“…ed in the writing can be parties to the contract …”. As the editor of Chapter 5, Professor Hugh Beale, goes to explain in 5-043, in Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2003] UKHL 62, [2004] 1 AC 219:…”
- Cited — Gregor Fisken Ltd v Carl (Rev 1) 2021-05-28
“… the general principle that “factual matrix” material is admissible to clarify the meaning of a contract, but not to contradict it (Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2003] UKHL 62, [2004] 1 AC 919 at [49], Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, [201] AC 1619 at [17]). In my judgment, once account is taken of the well-established signature prin…”
- Cited — Aspen Underwriting Ltd & Ors v Credit Europe Bank NV 2018-11-21
“…sible to have recourse to parol evidence. We were referred to passages from authorities emanating from very different contexts, namely: Shogun Finance v Hudson [2003] UKHL 62; [2004] 1 AC 919, esp., at [49], [153], [154] and [161]; Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Ltd (The Starsin) [2003] UKHL 12; [2004] 1 AC 715, at…”