How many times has [2005] UKHL 11 been cited?

[2005] UKHL 11 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] UKHL 11

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] UKHL 11

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — FIMBank Plc v KCH Shipping Co Ltd 2023-05-24
“…Lord Hamblen referred also to the note of caution expressed by Lord Bingham in The Rafaela S [2005] UKHL 11, [2005] 2 AC 423 at [19]:…”
Cited — AP Moller-Maersk A/S (t/a Maersk Line) v Kyokuyo Ltd 2018-04-17
“…bill issued had been a straight consigned bill in line with the draft bill of lading, as JI Macwilliam Co Inc v Mediterranean Shipping Co S.A.(“The Rafaela S”) [2005] UKHL 11; [2005] 2 AC 423 established that straight consigned bills are within Article 1(b). However, no bill of lading had been issued, only the sea waybills which wer…”