- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v The Queen (on the application of) AM 2022-06-10
“…In R(Khadir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 39; [2006] 1 AC 207 the House of Lords held that it was lawful to restrict a person to temporary admission, even though the prospect of removing that person was r…”
- Cited — Kaitey (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-12-10
“…on as it was at various times, how it was amended, and how it related to the decisions of the courts in R (Khadir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 39; [2006] 1 AC 207; and B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 5; [2018] AC 418.…”
- Cited — RA (Iraq) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-05-17
“…[2005] UKHL 39…”
- Considered — RA (Iraq) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-05-17
“…First, in R (Khadir) v SSHD [2005] UKHL 39; [2006] 1 AC 207, the House of Lords considered the case of a person who had no lawful basis for remaining in the UK, but could not be removed to the Kurdish A…”
- Cited — RA (Iraq) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-05-17
“…and irremovable is that the failure to grant them leave will leave them in limbo, and that this amounts to a breach of their article 8 rights. In Khadir v SSHD [2005] UKHL 39 at paragraph 4, Lady Hale observed that there may come a time when the prospects of the person ever being able safely to return, whether voluntarily or compuls…”
- Cited — RA (Iraq) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-05-17
“…er” (whatever that means in this context) be removed: that simply reflects the observations of Lady Hale in Khadir v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 39, [2006] 1 AC 207 at para. 4 (p. 211) (see also Abdullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 42). But that has nothing to do with a pol…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Lucas, R (On the Application Of) 2018-11-16
“… simply “until”: the removal or departure does not have to be pending, still less impending or imminent (R (Khadir v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 39; [2006] 1 AC 207 at [32] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood with whom the rest of the House agreed: see also Baroness Hale of Richmond at [4] to the same ef…”