- Followed — The 3Million & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor 2023-12-11
“…in R (Khatun) v Newham LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 55; [2005] QB 37, at para 47 (Laws LJ); and the decision of the House of Lords in R (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 58; [2006] 2 AC 148, at para 21 (Lord Bingham of Cornhill). This led Collins J to conclude as follows, at para 33:…”
- Cited — Sahra Moge v London Brough of Ealing 2023-04-27
“… Commission [2007] EWHC 1205 (Admin), para 33. This is especially so where the Code is designed to protect vulnerable people: R(Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 58, [2006] 2 AC 148. By definition, any homeless household in priority need will be vulnerable in this sense. The authority must also have a proper evidential bas…”
- Cited — Butt, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-03-08
“…[2005] UKHL 58…”
- Cited — AB, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice 2019-01-18
“…In Dennehy, Singh J was wrong to hold that he was bound by the decisions in R (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 58; [2006] 2 AC 148 or Shahid v Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 58; [2016] AC 429 to conclude that article 8 was engaged. In Shahid, this point was not argued but …”
- Cited — CXF, R (On the Application Of) v Central Bedfordshire Council NHS North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group 2018-12-20
“…be used as an aid to interpreting the Act of Parliament under which it is issued. As authority for its status they relied on R (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 58; [2006] 2 AC 148, paras 20-21, where the House of Lords held that the code issued under section 118, although it does not have binding effect and is not instru…”
- Cited — Hemmati & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-10-04
“… constitute a sufficient legal basis capable of qualifying as “law” as that concept is used in the ECHR: see, in particular, R (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 58; [2006] 2 AC 148, [34] (Lord Bingham of Cornhill), [91]-[94] (Lord Hope of Craighead) and [103] (Lord Scott of Foscote). That case concerned rules for segregat…”
- Considered — Hemmati & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-10-04
“…Mr Swift invoked R (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 58, [2006] 2 AC 148 in support of his argument on this point. Sales LJ considers he was correct to do so. It is not obvious, however, that Munjaz assists. It cert…”