- Cited — Vale SA v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor 2023-11-24
“…rong, in the sense of being outside the generous ambit where reasonable decision makers may disagree”: see Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd (No.2) [2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 WLR 4495 at 4500. For the reasons set out below, I am firmly of the view that Vale has no prospect of persuading the full court that they have cleare…”
- Cited — FXF v English Karate Federation Limited & Anor 2023-07-26
“…The claimant then cited Prince Abdulaziz v. Apex Global Management Ltd [2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 WLR 4495 (Prince Abdulaziz) at [30]-[31] to the effect that the strength of the merits is generally irrelevant in relation to relief from sanctions. …”
- Approved — Verition Advisors (UK Partners) LLP v Jump Trading International Limited 2023-06-20
“… is a decision which has exceeded the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible: see Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd (No 2) [2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 WLR 4495 at paragraph 13 (approving the test set out by Lewison LJ in Broughton v Kop Football (Cayman) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1743 at paragraph 51).…”
- Applied — Re C & Ors (Care Proceedings: Fact Finding) 2023-01-26
“…plainly wrong in the sense of being outside the generous ambit where reasonable decision makers may disagree: see Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd [2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 WLR 4495 at paragraph 13. This principle of restraint is applied in family cases as in any other. In Re TG (Care Proceedings: Case Management: Expert…”
- Cited — Mark John Wilson & Anor. v Michael Bernard McNamara 2023-01-16
“… is plainly wrong in the sense of being outside the generous ambit where reasonable decision makers may disagree: Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd [2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 WLR 4495 at [13]. It is also clear from [29] of the same case that the strength of a party's case on the ultimate merits of the proceedings is genera…”
- Considered — Global 100 Limited v Maria Laleva 2021-12-03
“…nly wrong in the sense that it is outside the generous ambit where reasonable decision makers may disagree: Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd (No 2)[2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 WLR 4495. But I do not consider that a decision that a defendant has shown no real prospect of success in defending a claim is a case management deci…”
- Approved — Michael, R (on the application of) v HMP Whitemoor & Anor 2020-01-23
“…not be interfered with or reversed by appellate courts unless it was, as Lord Neuberger put it in Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd (No. 2) [2014] UKSC 64 (approving of the test in Broughton v Kop Football (Cayman) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ…”
- Approved — First Tower Trustees Ltd & Anor v CDS (Superstores International) Ltd 2018-06-19
“…omething else I have said before (Broughton v Kop Football (Cayman) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1743 at [51], approved in Prince Abdulaziz v Apex Global Management Ltd [2014] UKSC 64; [2014] 1 WLR 4495):…”
- Approved — Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1) 2018-01-18
“…wrong in the sense of being outside the generous ambit where reasonable decision makers may disagree’: see Global Torch Ltd v Apex Global Management Ltd (No.2) [2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 WLR 4495, at 4500 per Lord Neuberger, approving the test stated by Lewison LJ in Broughton v Kop Football (Cayman) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1743 at [51].”…”