- Applied — U3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-07-14
“…erred to Rehman, but to two decisions which were either wrong, or irrelevant (paragraphs 73-76 and 77-79). In Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591, the Supreme Court appeared mistakenly to have thought that section 4 applied to section 2B appeals, when it had been repealed, and had neve…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v Lisa Smith 2023-04-05
“…Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591 shows that deprivation is a ‘draconian’ power and can only be exercised when it is proportionate to do so. Mr Southey particularly relied on…”
- Cited — R3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-02-17
“…In a further supplementary skeleton argument dated 22 December 2022, Mr Southey relied on Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591 and R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 63. Pham is said to show that the right to enter the United Kingdom is an…”
- Cited — The Queen (on the application of D4) (notice of deprivation of citizenship) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-01-26
“…on ground that the removal of a person’s citizenship engages a person’s fundamental rights: see, for example, Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591 per Lord Carnwath JSC at [60], Lord Mance JSC at [97], Lord Sumption JSC at [108] and Lord Reed JSC at [120].…”
- Cited — Kaitey (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-12-10
“…In Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591, at para. 118, Lord Reed JSC said that, in a number of cases concerned with important rights, such as the right of access to justice and leg…”
- Cited — Laci v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-05-20
“…f a proportionality test, referring to the well-known dicta of Lord Mance, Lord Carnwath and Lord Sumption in Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19, [2015] 1 WLR 1591. Leggatt LJ did not accept the submission as such, which went further than his principle (5) (which refers to proportionality only to the ex…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tariq 2021-03-16
“…[2015] UKSC 19 [2013] 1591). In Pham, the Vietnamese Government…”
- Cited — Plan B Earth v Secretary of State for Transport 2020-02-27
“…Having cited relevant authority, including the decisions of the Supreme Court in Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 W.L.R. 1591 and Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2014] UKSC 20; [2015] 1 A.C. 455, and observations made by Carnwath L.J., as he then was, in Offi…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v E3 & Anor 2019-11-21
“…it was open to the Secretary of State to rely on evidence of practice in a statelessness case, by reference to the decision of the Supreme Court in Pham v SSHD [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1…”
- Cited — KV, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-11-08
“…In support of this argument Mr Southey relied on dicta of the Supreme Court in Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591, in particular of Lord Mance at para 98, to the effect that, given the fundamental importance of citizenship, the “tool of proportionality” …”
- Cited — Pham v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-09-20
“…ess for that purpose if he had de jure nationality in another country, even if he was de facto stateless: see Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591. The Supreme Court adopted a flexible approach to principles of judicial review, particularly where fundamental rights are at stake. Thus th…”
- Cited — Browne v The Parole Board of England & Wales 2018-09-20
“…ntervening) [2014] UKSC 20, [2015] AC 455, paras 51 and 54, and Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Open Society Justice Initiative intervening) [2015] UKSC 19, [2015] 1 WLR 1591, paras 96, 113 and 115 show, the domestic law may already be moving away to some extent from the irrationality test in some cases.”…”
- Cited — Micula & Ors v Romania (Rev 1) 2018-07-27
“…icular circumstances of this case - a solution which is redolent of the wise counsel cited by Leggatt LJ from Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591, [91] in the possibly different context of a conflict arising from case law which the CJEU had already decided. So far as Article 351 is con…”
- Cited — Micula & Ors v Romania (Rev 1) 2018-07-27
“…e.g. R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3; [2014] 1 WLR 324, para 79; Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19; [2015] 1 WLR 1591, [80], [90]; R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5; [2018] A.C. 61, [41]-[42]. Second, section 2(1) o…”