- Cited — Daniel Richard Jwanczuk v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-10-11
“…[2015] UKSC 47, [2015] 1 WLR 3250) and that the…”
- Cited — AR & SXC, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2020-01-29
“…s an “other status” within Article 14, relying, by way of analogy, on the approach of the Supreme Court in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 3250, at para. 22 (Lord Wilson JSC). He found that the defendant had failed to establish that this differential treatment was objectively justifi…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…This approach was endorsed by Lord Wilson, giving the lead judgment of the Supreme Court in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 3250, at para 21.…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…A domestic case which illustrates the same point is Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 3250. There the treatment which was held to violate article 14 was the suspension of payments of disability living allowance to the claimant, a c…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…Article 3(1) of the UNCRC was also invoked in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 3250. As mentioned earlier, the claimant in that case was a child who, under statutory regulations, ceased to receive disability living allowance…”
- Cited — AB, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice 2019-01-18
“…rd Carnwath and Lord Hughes in SG ([105] to [108] and [150] to [153]), as endorsed by the Supreme Court in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 3250.…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…the European Court of Human Rights to fall within “other status” in article 14. As Lord Wilson observed in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 2250, para 22, it is clear that, if the alleged discrimination falls within the scope of a Convention right, the European Court is reluctant to c…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…ork and Pensions (Child Poverty Action Group Intervening) [2015] UKSC 16; [2015] 1 WLR 1449, paras 11, 93; Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 3250, paras 26-27; R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57; [2015] 1 WLR 3820, paras 27, 75-77; R (MA)…”
- Applied — The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor 2018-03-20
“…as the Upper Tribunal did in the present case, following and applying the decision of the Supreme Court in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47? The principal argument of the Secretary of State in this appeal is that, in setting aside the original decision and devising its own solution, the Upper Tribu…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor 2018-03-20
“…The Upper Tribunal went on to conclude at [62] that, in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015] 1 WLR 3250 and similar authorities:…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor 2018-03-20
“…Most recently, the same approach was once again adopted by the Supreme Court in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47, [2015] 1 WLR 3250. The facts of that case and relevant parts of the judgments have been set out by Flaux LJ at [22]-[24] above. In short, the Supreme Court co…”
- Cited — DA & Orss, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2018-03-15
“…n right, as the Strasbourg court typically describes it, even where the right is not directly engaged: see Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47; [2015]1 WLR 3250 per Lord Wilson para.17. As Lord Wilson pointed out, an example of such a situation is provided by Carson v United Kingdom [2010] 51 EHHR 369…”