- Cited — Paul Mark Simon v Lauren Belinda Simon & Anor 2023-09-15
“…nt of the parties, whereas in ordinary civil proceedings, a consent order derives its authority from the contract made between the parties: Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2015] 2 FLR 1367 at [29]. Although the court should not act as a ‘bloodhound or a ferret’ (L v L [2006] EWHC 956 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 26 at [73]), it does ret…”
- Cited — Sofia Bogolyubova v Gennadiy Bogolyubov & Anor 2023-05-18
“…[2015] UKSC 60…”
- Cited — Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts 2023-02-15
“…e full and true facts were ascertained; the non-disclosure had deprived the wife “of a real prospect of doing better at a full hearing” per Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2016] AC 871 at [35]. Holman J did not accept that a judge having regard to all matters in section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973, (“the 1973 Act”) w…”
- Followed — Haley v Haley 2020-10-23
“…In Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2015] 2 FLR 1367, the Supreme Court considered the relationship between the court and parties who wish to resolve their financial dispute following divorce b…”
- Cited — E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2019-08-14
“…cope of s.31F(6) in the context of financial remedy proceedings has been addressed by the Supreme Court in Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61 and Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60. These were cases where the reopening of final financial orders was sought on the basis of allegations of fraudulent non-disclosure. In both cases, the origina…”
- Cited — Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors 2018-11-02
“…family proceedings in relation to which there is a duty of full and frank disclosure and the court retains jurisdiction – see, for example, Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2016] AC 871 and Gohil v Gohil (No 2) [2015] UKSC 61, [2016] AC 849.…”