Home › Cases › [2016] UKSC 40[2016] UKSC 40
· cited by 2 · influence score 15 /100
Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite [2016] UKSC 40
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment Cited · 2
Citation network [2016] UKSC 40 Baker & Anor v Craggs (Rev 1) Scott v HM Revenue and Customs cited by Cited by (2) Cited — Scott v HM Revenue and Customs 2020-01-22 “…See too the observations of Lord Neuberger PSC in Edwards v Kumarasamy [2016] UKSC 40, [2016] AC 1334, at [17]:…”
Cited — Baker & Anor v Craggs (Rev 1) 2018-05-16 “…ly have made this clear. Moreover, the natural meaning to which I have referred is reflected in the language used by Lord Neuberger PSC in Edwards v Kumarasamy [2016] UKSC 40, [2016] AC 1334, at [23], where he said:…”
Frequently cited alongside