- Cited — The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors 2019-07-12
“…re, the proceedings by Servier for an interlocutory injunction) must have been commenced without reasonable and probable cause and with malice: Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 43, [2018] AC 779. That is a relevant consideration irrespective of the fact that, in the present case, the NHS was not the defendant to any proceedings institute…”
- Cited — Stallion Eight Shipping Co. SA v Natwest Markets Plc 2018-12-11
“…(supra); The Kommunar (No. 3) [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 22, at pp. 29 et seq; Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 43; [2016] 3 WLR 477, per Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony, at [68] – [78]. It is recognised that this rule of English Law is capable of bearing harshly on a shipow…”
- Followed — Rees & Ors v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis 2018-07-05
“…This view is, I think, supported by what Lord Toulson said about the element of “malice” in Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 43 at paragraph 55 as follows:…”
- Cited — Hickey v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2018-04-20
“…ourt departed from a decision of the Inner House: see, by analogy, The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Deane [2010] EWCA Civ 699 and Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 43.…”