- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37; [2006] 1 AC 173 and R (A) v Secretary of State for Health (Alliance for Choice and other intervening) [2017] UKSC 41; [2017] 1 WLR 2492), “homelessness” (see R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions…”
- Applied — Ward & Ors, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors 2019-04-16
“…ble foundation” test applies to the first and second stages (and possibly to the third), it does not apply to the fourth: R (A) v Secretary of State for Health [2017] UKSC 41, [2017] 1 WLR 2492 at [33].…”
- Cited — BA, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2018-12-07
“…fic duties and powers of the Secretary of State under the 2006 Act. It held that, as a result of Lord Wilson’s judgment in R(A) v Secretary of State for Health [2017] UKSC 41, [2017] 1 WLR 2492 (“A”), endorsing statements of Ward LJ in R(A) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] EWCA Civ 225, [2010] 1 WLR 279 (“YA”), the intention o…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…vSecretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37; [2006] 1 AC 173 and R (A) v Secretary of State for Health (Alliance for Choice and other intervening) [2017] UKSC 41; [2017] 1 WLR 2492), “homelessness” (see the RJM case), a person’s immigration status (see R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills …”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…ew has since been endorsed by Lord Wilson in giving the majority judgment in R (A) v Secretary of State for Health (Alliance for Choice and others intervening) [2017] UKSC 41; [2017] 1 WLR 2492, para 33.…”
- Applied — DA & Orss, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2018-03-15
“…2015] AC 1016 para.52 which were applied in the judgment of Lord Wilson, with which Lords Kerr and Hughes agreed, in R(A and B) v Secretary of State for Health [2017] UKSC 41, para.33. Even if, as Lord Wilson said, the fourth question was one which constitutionally “the court can answer for itself”, I cannot envisage that it would f…”