How many times has [2018] UKSC 25 been cited?

[2018] UKSC 25 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2018] UKSC 25

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2018] UKSC 25

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — The Electronic Collar Manufacturers Association & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food And Rural Affairs 2021-05-11
“…an e-collars did not treat e-collars and containment systems in a consistent way. He referred to R (Gallaher Group Limited) v Competition and Markets Authority [2018] UKSC 25; [2019] AC 96.…”
Cited — Competition and Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Ors 2020-05-12
“…rd Neuberger MR in Perinpanathan to “regulatory functions”. These are not confined to specific obligations. As Lord Sumption put it in R (Gallaher Group) v CMA [2018] UKSC 25, [2018] 2 WLR 1583 at [46]:…”
Cited — Pathan & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-10-02
“…aid in Talpada now needs to be read in the light of the more recent decision of the Supreme Court in R (Gallaher Group Ltd) v Competition and Markets Authority [2018] UKSC 25; [2018] 2 WLR 1583 and, if anything, has been reinforced by what was said in that case. Although Gallaher was not cited before us, it is (to say the least) ver…”