- Cited — Mohamed Amersi v Charlotte Leslie 2023-12-07
“…ional harm has been caused or is likely to be caused as a matter of fact, although this can in principle be done inferentially: Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, [2020] AC 612. A claimant cannot succeed unless he pleads and proves that this requirement is met. Para 4.2(3) of the Part 53 Practice Direction requires the …”
- Cited — Dr Craig Wright v Peter McCormack 2023-07-26
“…[2019] UKSC 27, [2020] AC 612.…”
- Cited — Arron Banks v Carole Cadwalladr 2023-02-28
“…port of that point the judge referred to a passage in the judgment of Lord Sumption, speaking for a unanimous Supreme Court, in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, [2020] AC 612 (“Lachaux SC”) at [16].…”
- Cited — Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-07-28
“…lication complained about, is inadmissible evidence in mitigation of damages, see Dingle v Associated Newspapers [1964] AC 371, and Lachaux v Independent Print [2019] UKSC 27; [2020] AC 612 at paragraph 24. In Dingle v Associated Newspapers the Town Clerk of Manchester had been (wrongly) accused by a Parliamentary select committee o…”
- Cited — Walter Tzvi Soriano v Forensic News LLC & Ors. 2021-12-21
“…As Lord Sumption observed in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, [2020] AC 612 [2]: “Broadly speaking, [the 2013 Act] seeks to modify some of the common law rules which were seen unduly to favour the protection of reputatio…”
- Cited — Corbyn v Millett 2021-04-20
“…t had a defamatory tendency, but also that it did as matter of fact cause serious reputational harm or was likely to do so: see Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27 [2020] AC 612. We are not concerned with this issue. Master Cook refused Mr Corbyn’s application for a trial of serious harm as a preliminary issue.…”